Understanding Michigan's Controversial New Marijuana Tax

Michigan is once again at the forefront of significant cannabis policy debates, now centered on a new 24% wholesale marijuana tax that has already sparked constitutional controversy. As court proceedings begin, this case is attracting national focus not only due to its implications on cannabis pricing but also for its broader impact on voter-endorsed laws and tax regulation nationwide.

Even if you don't consume cannabis or reside far from Michigan, this case holds weight. Its outcome could set a precedent for how other states develop, amend, and defend cannabis taxation policies, potentially foretelling future legal battles as the industry expands.

Here’s what you need to know about this pivotal case.

The Details of Michigan's Tax Proposal

As part of the 2025–2026 budget, Michigan legislators sanctioned a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, intended to generate funds for road infrastructure enhancements. This tax would impact transactions early in the supply chain—prior to products reaching dispensary displays.

Currently, Michigan enforces two other cannabis-related taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis purchases enacted in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax

If instituted, the new wholesale tax would establish one of the most layered cannabis tax regimes in the United States.

The Cannabis Industry's Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contests the tax's constitutionality. Their argument hinges on the premise that:

The 2018 voter-approved marijuana statute cannot be altered without a supermajority vote.

With Michigan voters’ approval for recreational cannabis via the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), this law was protected. Any changes require a three-fourths supermajority.

However, lawmakers approved the wholesale tax with just a simple majority.

Rose Tantraphol, MCIA spokesperson, stressed the importance in comments reported by Michigan Advance:

“As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry groups also caution that the tax would raise costs, burden small enterprises, and potentially drive consumers back to unregulated channels—a trend observed in high-tax states like California.

Image 3

The State's Defense

Michigan’s administration contends the tax's legality because:

  • The wholesale tax is new, not an amendment to the 2018 voter-approved legislation

  • The legislature holds the power to implement taxes for fiscal needs

  • Its primary function is funding road infrastructure, not modifying cannabis regulation

If judicial approval is obtained, the tax could be enforced starting January 1, 2026.

Implications for Consumers

Even for those far from Michigan, particularly stakeholders in the cannabis economy, this situation is noteworthy as cannabis tax structures often influence state-wide policies. If the tax withstands the challenge:

  • Wholesale prices will increase

  • Retailers might elevate prices accordingly

  • Some users might opt for more affordable, unregulated markets

  • Smaller businesses could face consolidation pressures

If the tax is nullified, Michigan’s existing tax framework—already a more economical model nationally—would remain.

Why This Case Resonates Nationwide

Though the lawsuit unfolds in Michigan, its ramifications extend beyond its borders.

1. It challenges the boundaries of voter-approved legislation

If legislative bodies can impose taxes without supermajority consent, it might transform how ballot measures operate in states that employ them.

2. It may sway other states' cannabis taxation strategies

States dealing with inadequate infrastructure funding may contemplate analogous taxes, should Michigan’s be upheld.

3. It underscores a persistent national issue: disparities in cannabis taxation

Some states like Oregon and Michigan have lower cannabis taxes, maintaining legal market competitiveness, while places like California encounter high taxes leading to thriving illicit markets.

Michigan’s lawsuit could serve as a blueprint for tax-related legal contests in other states.

The Road Ahead

Michigan’s Court of Claims judge has heard preliminary arguments and is poised to rule soon. The decision might eventually ascend to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Regardless of the outcome, the judgment will hold substantial importance—not only for Michigan’s cannabis industry, but also in shaping how states nationwide navigate voter-approved legislation, emergent sectors, and their tax jurisdiction.

Image 1

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
InPhoqus Accounting & Tax Services We love to chat!
Please feel free to use our Ai powered chat assistant or contact us using the buttons below.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully